Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
1 Source
Style:
APA
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:

Discussion Of The Scientific Principle, Pseudoscientific Claim And Research Material

Case Study Instructions:

This essay requires that focus on scientific thinking about psychological issues. Please focus on Analyzing how the principles of scientific thinking and warning signs of pseudoscience apply to it, and critique the research methods used in the research description. 800 words in total. It divides as: 200 words to the discussion of the scientific principle, 200 words to the discussion of the pseudoscientific claim, and 200 words EACH to the application of two ideas from the research methods material.
Thank you so much:)
I am appreciate for it.

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

Pseudoscientific Claim and Research Methodology
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation

Pseudoscientific Claim and Research Methodology
Science is a methodical procedure to acquire information. The final output is dependent on principles that naturally came to exist. People come up with claims periodically, and explaining the sophisticated phenomenon is essential to eliminate stigma and sprout clarification.
Treadmill desks made extraordinary sales with their entry into the market that sparked a lot of questions and researchers’ attention. While the company had already carried out their scientific study to prove the capability of the desk, it was necessary for other scientists to do the same to prove the eligibility. Replicability is the scientific principle, elaborating that if the same procedure is carried out in an initial scientific study, the findings should be identical. Researchers Dr. Don and Dr. Susan from Harvard carried out a study on 1000 initial and frequent users of the treadmill, and the results were inexplicable.
The experiment meant to determine brain activity while using the treadmill desk and sitting on a normal desk, proved that there was extra brain activity in the frontal lobe while using the treadmill. The sample population was able to correct irregular spelled words rightly in comparison to the other scenario. Conclusively, replicability is the dominant scientific principle proven by the case study (Lilienfeld, 2015).
Progressively, Pseudoscience features more of the claims that are under investigation rather than relying on confirmation and providing accurate information on a theory. Scientists describe it as the deceptive side of proving claims. In the case investigation, the pseudoscience claim, ‘Talk of proof instead of evidence’ explains that the world of science only supports and disproves claims developed, rather than also explaining the reason for certain actions (Lilienfeld, 2015). Science in the treadmill research supported the claim that when an individual is actively doing physical activity, their mental ability is triggered.
This section of the brain undertakes solving activities within the brain. The proof that there was exemplary activity in the frontal lobe where most brain thinking activities occur was not enough to explain why and how it happens. It is a phenomenon that is essentially close to impossible to explain since it involves body mechanisms that are sophisticated and scientists tend to dismiss it for further research and innovation. The treadmill desk was more of a commercial idea to make money and create a fuss to increase sales. Despite the fact being prove...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples: